Considered / Rejected / Superseded

PROJECT ENDURING PULSE

Considered, Rejected & Superseded

Ideas intentionally not carried into the current architecture

v1.2.2 Publication & Advancement Clarification | September 2026

Rejected: treating social cohesion or cross-species contact as independent authority for government-directed private social engineering. Cohesion is a valuable consequence of useful collaboration, not a license to compel relationships.

Rejected: species-role stereotypes such as humans = creativity/leadership and synths = calculation/execution. Complementary tendencies never determine an individual's permitted role.

IdeaStatus / reasonCurrent rule
Rank-sum/Borda presidential countingRejected after clone sensitivityPairwise/Condorcet architecture; Schulze working default
Compulsory voting / ballot returnRejected as overbroadVoting remains voluntary; impaired-election certification is rare backstop
Old 10%/5%/3% turnout staircaseSuperseded after selective-turnout stressIndependent impairment architecture + extraordinary certification
Near-unanimous 14/15 personhood panelsRejected for excessive false negatives12/15 with multiple independent panels and epistemic diversity
Per-linked-cohort illicit-origin capRejected as vulnerable to split-provenance evasion30% aggregate active illicit-origin ceiling
Rogue integration displacing lawful creationRejectedIllicit-origin integration is supplemental
Separate species militaries / survival systemsRejectedSpecies-operable pathways preserve the whole population in one civilization
Political integration without shared competence/collaborationRejected as insufficientFunctional Integration elevated to doctrine for complementary capability, continuity, and anti-bifurcation
Rigid or government-mandated eternal 50/50 staffing / 1:1 pairingRejected as overfrozenEntrenched purpose, adaptable mechanics
Government-forced private integrationRejectedNo compelled friends, family, residence, religion or occupation for integration
Blanket no-systematic-sacrifice limiter on LRHRejected as inconsistent with intended use of synthetic durabilityVoluntary materially safer synthetic hazardous specialization + make-whole duties
Historical population percentage as trusteeship exitRejectedUse sufficient mature civic capacity and staged return
Earth/home-world perpetual sovereigntyRejectedSelf-sustaining worlds presumptively self-governing
Isolationism toward external slaveryRejectedExternal oppression matters morally
Automatic liberation warRejectedProportionality, realistic prospects and preservation of the free society
Fixed constitutional public/private infrastructure modelRejected as false precisionPreserve legislative ownership/access/competition tools
HEAH as adopted sentencing ruleDeferred / rejected todayResearch-only until substantially better evidence
The Continuity Compact / The Eternum Charter as current nameSupersededProject Enduring Pulse

Rejected: presenting the 114/120 long-horizon result as independent validation that PULSE is superior. Architecture-effectiveness parameters are explicit hypotheses; the model is conditional systems analysis.

Earlier public explanations emphasized possible shared advancement rather than catastrophe. The current explanation starts more simply: if AI becomes a person, what rules would humans and synthetic persons need to live together without either permanently ruling the other? The safeguards and the possibility of useful cooperation remain part of the same framework.

Rejected: treating total simulation/trial count as evidence strength. Counts belong in methodology/provenance; assumption quality and failure-mode findings matter more.

Rejected: making Least Reversible Harm an immutable hardware-level morality instruction. Hardware may preserve continuity and change risk; LRH remains a constitutional/moral reasoning principle.

Rejected: concealing AI assistance. Human-directed, AI-assisted development should be stated openly rather than discovered indirectly.