PROJECT ENDURING PULSE
Considered, Rejected & Superseded
Ideas intentionally not carried into the current architecture
v1.2.2 Publication & Advancement Clarification | September 2026
Rejected: treating social cohesion or cross-species contact as independent authority for government-directed private social engineering. Cohesion is a valuable consequence of useful collaboration, not a license to compel relationships.
Rejected: species-role stereotypes such as humans = creativity/leadership and synths = calculation/execution. Complementary tendencies never determine an individual's permitted role.
| Idea | Status / reason | Current rule |
|---|---|---|
| Rank-sum/Borda presidential counting | Rejected after clone sensitivity | Pairwise/Condorcet architecture; Schulze working default |
| Compulsory voting / ballot return | Rejected as overbroad | Voting remains voluntary; impaired-election certification is rare backstop |
| Old 10%/5%/3% turnout staircase | Superseded after selective-turnout stress | Independent impairment architecture + extraordinary certification |
| Near-unanimous 14/15 personhood panels | Rejected for excessive false negatives | 12/15 with multiple independent panels and epistemic diversity |
| Per-linked-cohort illicit-origin cap | Rejected as vulnerable to split-provenance evasion | 30% aggregate active illicit-origin ceiling |
| Rogue integration displacing lawful creation | Rejected | Illicit-origin integration is supplemental |
| Separate species militaries / survival systems | Rejected | Species-operable pathways preserve the whole population in one civilization |
| Political integration without shared competence/collaboration | Rejected as insufficient | Functional Integration elevated to doctrine for complementary capability, continuity, and anti-bifurcation |
| Rigid or government-mandated eternal 50/50 staffing / 1:1 pairing | Rejected as overfrozen | Entrenched purpose, adaptable mechanics |
| Government-forced private integration | Rejected | No compelled friends, family, residence, religion or occupation for integration |
| Blanket no-systematic-sacrifice limiter on LRH | Rejected as inconsistent with intended use of synthetic durability | Voluntary materially safer synthetic hazardous specialization + make-whole duties |
| Historical population percentage as trusteeship exit | Rejected | Use sufficient mature civic capacity and staged return |
| Earth/home-world perpetual sovereignty | Rejected | Self-sustaining worlds presumptively self-governing |
| Isolationism toward external slavery | Rejected | External oppression matters morally |
| Automatic liberation war | Rejected | Proportionality, realistic prospects and preservation of the free society |
| Fixed constitutional public/private infrastructure model | Rejected as false precision | Preserve legislative ownership/access/competition tools |
| HEAH as adopted sentencing rule | Deferred / rejected today | Research-only until substantially better evidence |
| The Continuity Compact / The Eternum Charter as current name | Superseded | Project Enduring Pulse |
Rejected: presenting the 114/120 long-horizon result as independent validation that PULSE is superior. Architecture-effectiveness parameters are explicit hypotheses; the model is conditional systems analysis.
Earlier public explanations emphasized possible shared advancement rather than catastrophe. The current explanation starts more simply: if AI becomes a person, what rules would humans and synthetic persons need to live together without either permanently ruling the other? The safeguards and the possibility of useful cooperation remain part of the same framework.
Rejected: treating total simulation/trial count as evidence strength. Counts belong in methodology/provenance; assumption quality and failure-mode findings matter more.
Rejected: making Least Reversible Harm an immutable hardware-level morality instruction. Hardware may preserve continuity and change risk; LRH remains a constitutional/moral reasoning principle.
Rejected: concealing AI assistance. Human-directed, AI-assisted development should be stated openly rather than discovered indirectly.